ВАСИЛИКС

Захваљујући https://twitter.com/vladimircicovic, и ја сам завирио у те документе који су кобива тајна. Па их овдје преносим под кодним именом Василикс.

Лично, нисам имао амбиције да копам по томе, а ни по домаћим. Која будала ће читати своје изјаве из неког другог времена.

Јасно је да овдашњи шпијуни аматери нечим морају да оправдају лову и ангажман. Није ми јасно ко, у Централи, СТЈ, има времена и знања да то све чита, сортира и анализира. Кад сам ја за све те године можда дао и десет хиљада разних изјава, иступа и коментара, као Извршни Секретар или Министар или Портпарол Странке независних социјалдемократа. А таквих звизгова као ја, има на хиљаде.

Ну. Само ви, кретени, радите свој посао.

Захваленије Владимиру Цицовићу.

Classified By: DCM Judith B. Cefkin for Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D) 1. (C) SUMMARY: In two recent op-eds, Rajko Vasic, Secretary General of Republika Srpska (RS) PM Milorad Dodik's Alliance of Independent Social Democrats (SNSD), presents a state-level investigation into possible corruption in the RS and the 13-year post-Dayton effort to strengthen the state as part of a conspiracy designed to destroy the RS. Vasic fingers the Bosniaks and elements of the international community as organizers of the conspiracy. In the first piece, which appeared on October 4, Vasic essentially demanded that state-level authorities end their investigation, which he implies is illegal. Vasic's October 8 piece, which appeared after the municipal elections and cannot be characterized as aimed at winning votes, calls for a return to the level of autonomy the RS enjoyed immediately post-Dayton (an outcome that would make Bosnia an unworkable state incapable of joining the EU and NATO). Vasic is clear about the potential consequences, if RS demands are ignored: Bosnia will dissolve. Much in Vasic's op-eds echo themes presented by Dodik in his September 18 RFE interview. The implication of both pieces is that the dissolution would be the result of a defensive response by the RS to what he portrays as efforts to destroy it. END SUMMARY SIPA: Part of a Large Conspiracy Aimed at the RS --------------------------------------------- --- 2. (C) In an October 4 op-ed published in Fokus, an RS-based daily with a strong Serb-nationalist editorial line, Vasic casts State Investigation and Protection Agency's (SIPA) confrontation with the RS government over the latter's refusal to comply with a subpoena (Refs A,B,C,E) as part of a broader conspiracy aimed at the RS's destruction. (Note: SIPA's request for information from the RS government was made in connection with an investigation into alleged corruption associated with the construction of the RS government building. End Note) Vasic suggested that SIPA was working for the international community and Bosniaks, calling the law enforcement organization a "lever of coercion... logistically supported and instructed by... unidentified ambassadors and beys." He also asserted that SIPA, like all other state-level institutions, was created "not to demonstrate the efficiency of the self-proclaimed state and state bodies, but to suppress the overall efficiency of Republika Srpska and prove the criminal ch aracter of everything that exists there." Answer These Questions Three ---------------------------- 3. (C) Echoing and amplifying arguments made by the RS government in its September 11 conclusion and by Dodik in his September 25 letter to HighRep Lajcak, Vasic suggested that SIPA's request for information had been either improper or illegal. With this in mind, Vasic posed several questions that required answers, implying that those answers would substantiate RS claims about SIPA's actions. Among them were the following: -- Why did SIPA request documents without a court warrant and outside court procedures? (Comment: Under Bosnian law, SIPA has the right, without a warrant, to ask a public agency like the RS tax authority to assist an investigation by providing information. In any case, the initial SIPA request made clear reference to the order from the State Prosecutor's Office. In addition, OHR's Legal Department has told us that RS government agencies reportedly had cooperated with such investigations in the past. End Comment) -- Why did the warrants transpire later? (Comment: A "warrant" did not transpire later -- there was no need for a warrant under Bosnian law. After the RS government published its September 11 conclusion and sent its September 19 letter indicating that it would not cooperate with SIPA, the State Prosecutor's Office replied with a letter to the RS government reminding it of its obligations under Bosnian law to cooperate, and reiterating that the State Prosecutor's Office had asked SIPA to gather the information. Vasic's op-ed sought to turn this exchange, initiated by the RS, into a conspiracy. End Comment) --On what basis had the Office of the Prosecutor initiated the whole procedure? (Comment: Evidence of corruption in the RS had already been supplied to prosecutors. In any case, as we, OHR, and others have underscored to the RS government and RS officials, the RS government (i.e., the executive branch) is not competent to decide on jurisdictional issues, as Vasic's question implied. Nor, for that matter, is the RS judiciary; only the Courts of BiH are competent to determine questions of jurisdiction. End Comment) Any Answers (Other Than Mine) Are Invalid (or Worse) --------------------------------------------- ------- 4. (C) After having posed the questions, Vasic then dismisses them by saying that it really does not matter how these legal questions are answered by state-level or international community representatives (and, as noted, there are sound legal arguments to respond to each of them), because, he implies, these very people are part of the conspiracy to destroy the RS and cannot be trusted. The outcome, if state-level law enforcement and judicial institutions insist on their legal right to enforce the rule of law, Vasic concludes, will be the further disintegration of the Bosnian state. "Regardless of how the local and foreign idiots answer the above questions, the result will be the same: further loss of confidence in BiH, further self-destruction of the state...; further prevention of the establishment of new joint functions and progress on our European path." Four Elements of the Grand Conspiracy ------------------------------------- 5. (C) Vasic stresses that the SIPA request for information from the RS government is only one element of the conspiracy aimed at the RS's destruction. The second part of what Vasic labels "the project" is "the genocidization of Republika Srpska" (an obvious reference to Bosniak member of the Tri-Presidency Haris Silajdzic's rhetoric). The third part, he argues, is "the deliberate self-destruction of the (Federation)," which "will be used as evidence that entities are not sustainable." This explains Bosniak opposition to issues of concern to Croats, such as the creation of a third Croat-language public broadcasting television channel or the creation of a third, Croat-majority entity. The goal of Bosniak politicians, he concludes, "is to conquer the whole of Bosnia and Herzegovina, both Serbs and Croats." Finally, the fourth part of the conspiracy is to secure the support of Serb "quislings," whom Vasic identifies as SNSD's opposition -- the Serb Democratic Party (SDS). Good, Strong, Clear Entity Boundaries Make Good Neighbors --------------------------------------------- ------------ 6. (C) In an October 8 post-election op-ed, which also appeared in Fokus, Vasic presented SNSD's case for returning to the RS competencies previously transferred to the state and restoring the 1995 Dayton state. Vasic presented his case, which echoed arguments made by Dodik in his September 18 RFE interview (Ref D), in earthy, populist terms designed to appeal to the average Bosnian Serb. He notes that right after the 1992-1995 war the inter-entity boundary line (IEBL) was clearly marked, both literally -- "with metal pipes with red-painted tin on the top" -- and in terms of the authorities possessed by the RS. This began to change, Vasic argues, because the SDS "started ass-kissing foreigners" in order to remain in power in the RS and "plunder" it as long as possible." As a consequence, some RS competencies "were stolen, others removed so that there are now borders between us" (i.e., the two entities). 7. (C) The implication of Vasic's argument is that 1995 were halcyon days for the RS, and he makes clear that it is now time to re-build the barriers that previously existed between the entities. "Once again we should clearly mark the interentity line." Vasic attacks plans for constitutional reform as a further attempt to abolish the RS, presenting the Venice Commission and its recommendations as a stalking horse for anti-Serb Bosniaks. (Note: Silajdzic makes regular reference to the "Venice Commission recommendations," which among other things, call for reform of the entity voting system. The recent Parliamentary Assembly Council of Europe resolution on Bosnia, which so angered Serbs, also referred to the Venice Commission's recommendations. End Note) Vasic's Solution: Roll Back Reforms ----------------------------------- 8. (C) Vasic concludes by laying out SNSD's proposed constitutional remedies for reinvigorating the IEBL. These include: -- Republika Srpska is untouchable, unchangeable, and unmodifiable. -- Entity-based voting should be cemented. -- Competencies of BiH and entities should be brought back in line with the Dayton distribution of competencies. -- Absolute tripartite system in everything at the BiH level. -- Absolute consensus in decision making processes on the BiH level. -- Abolition of the armed forces. In essence, Vasic proposes the roll back of most, if not all, of the reforms of the last 13 years, that the entities become, in effect, states within the state, and the establishment of decision-making mechanisms at the state-level that would strengthen the Serbs' already formidable ability to prevent the state from functioning. Comment: Your Have Been Warned ------------------------------ 9. (C) In both his October 4 and October 8 op-eds Vasic is clear about the consequences for Bosnia if the RS demands he presents are not met (i.e., SIPA and the State Prosecutor drop its investigation into alleged corruption associated with the construction of the RS government building; "restoration" of the IEBL). On October 4, Vasic concludes that failure to heed his warnings will result in a "one way ticket from Bratislava to Podgorica;" on October 8, "the fall of the former Yugoslavia will end in Bosnia and Herzegovina." In other words, Vasic predicts the dissolution of Bosnia, and he strongly implies that this outcome will have been forced on the RS by conspiratorial, uncompromising Bosniaks and representatives of the international community. The core themes of Vasic's op-eds echo those presented by Dodik in his September 18 RFE interview. The first underscores that the RS is prepared for, perhaps even seeks, a confrontation with the state and the international community over the SIPA subpoena. The second reinforces our view that SNSD remains determined to pursue the vigorous anti-state agenda it has pursued over the last couple years whatever the costs. ENGLISH